Redefining the American Dream

For generations, the American dream meant the promise that hard work could open any door—that freedom, opportunity, and equality were not privileges but birthrights. Yet piece by piece, that vision is being rewritten. Laws once meant to expand rights are being rolled back. Freedoms that felt untouchable are now up for debate. And the definition of “opportunity” is shrinking to fit the agenda of those in power. The dream is still alive, but its meaning is shifting from a collective aspiration to an exclusive prize. If we let others decide who gets to dream, we’ll wake up in an America we no longer recognize. That’s why this week’s newsletter digs into the decisions reshaping the nation’s future and what they mean for all of us.

Author

Shaeleigh Severino
19 Aug • Estimated Reading Time: 8 minutes

 📉 Rights in Recession📉 

What Happened: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. is cancelling funding for mRNA vaccine development, a move Trump’s former surgeon general Dr. Jerome Adams warns carries deadly consequences. 22 projects worth $500 million at the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority will be impacted that help companies develop medical supplies to address public health threats. Though mRNA vaccines saved as many as 20 million lives in the COVID pandemic, Secretary Kennedy continues to claim the vaccine type is ineffective. 

Why It Matters: Spreading vaccine misinformation from the highest levels of government doesn’t just distort public understanding—it shapes dangerous policy. By gutting funding for proven mRNA research, the administration is gambling with lives and leaving the nation less prepared for the next public health crisis. Cutting off projects that could save millions in the future signals that ideology, not science, is driving decisions. This isn’t just short-sighted—it’s a choice that will echo in every preventable illness and death to come. It also sends a chilling message to scientists and public health experts that evidence-based work can be discarded for political convenience. Undermining trust in science today makes it harder to rally the public when the next emergency hits. In the end, this approach doesn’t just risk lives—it dismantles the very systems designed to save them.

What Happened: Trump is launching a federal takeover of DC with plans for FBI agents and 450 police officers to patrol the streets. Additionally, roughly 800 National Guard troops were activated by Trump to increase law enforcement presence. To justify his takeover, Trump has repeatedly cited false statistics that claim crime is rising in DC, but in reality, current crime numbers are lower than last year. 

Why It Matters: Trump’s federal takeover of DC paints a chilling picture of an administration willing to twist facts to consolidate power. Through deploying FBI agents, hundreds of police officers, and the National Guard under the guise of fighting crime, he is manufacturing a crisis to justify authoritarian control. False statistics and fearmongering are not just political tools—they are the building blocks of dictatorship. Normalizing this level of federal intervention over a city’s local governance erodes democratic norms and sets a precedent for future leaders to bypass truth in the name of control. If the facts can be manipulated to militarize a capital today, they can be twisted to silence dissent anywhere tomorrow.

📌Trump to Nominate Longtime Skeptic of Bureau of Labor Statistics as New Agency Head

What Happened: Trump plans to nominate E.J. Antoni, the chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, as the new commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Antoni has been a long-term skeptic of BLS data and supported Trump’s firing of former commissioner Erika McEntarfer over subpar job numbers. According to economists, Trump’s actions risk U.S. and global markets that rely on the perceived integrity of BLS numbers.

Why It Matters: Undermining the BLS by installing a leader who openly doubts its data puts the credibility of U.S. economic reporting in jeopardy. Markets, both domestic and global, depend on trustworthy numbers to guide decisions worth trillions, and shaking that trust could trigger instability far beyond America’s borders. Choosing a political loyalist over a data-driven professional, Trump signals that the nation’s economic scorekeeper is now just another partisan tool. Investors, businesses, and workers alike could be forced to navigate a market where facts are filtered through politics rather than measured by reality. Such manipulation doesn’t just skew public perception—it rewrites the very playbook that underpins a stable economy.

What Happened: In an appeal filed about the compensation she was ordered to pay a couple for denying them a marriage license, former Kentucky clerk Kim Davis has asked the Supreme Court to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges. The legal team behind Davis claims the landmark decision threatens the religious liberty of Americans who believe marriage is only between one man and one woman. This formal request follows the Supreme Court’s overturning of affirmative action and abortion, showing a willingness to reconsider cases like Obergefell.

Why It Matters: Kim Davis’s bid to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges is more than a personal legal fight—it’s part of a broader conservative push to roll back hard-won rights under the guise of religious liberty. Chipping away at the separation between church and state replaces equal protection with the beliefs of a single ideology, eroding the very freedoms the American dream promises. For same-sex couples, this isn’t an abstract legal debate but a direct threat to the legal protections, dignity, and stability that marriage provides. Queer love will always exist, but without those protections, equality fades into a privilege reserved for some rather than a right shared by all. The future of marriage equality now hinges on whether the nation chooses to expand freedom or narrow it.

What Happened: The White House has ordered the Smithsonian to adjust its social media, exhibition texts, and educational materials to align better with “American ideals.” Any supposedly divisive or partisan narratives will be targeted, a move Trump claims will restore confidence in the institution. Civil rights leaders have criticized the White House’s focus on African American history and its attempts to minimize the contributions of Black Americans.

Why It Matters: This move isn’t a gentle suggestion—it is a direct effort to reshape the story of America to match a partisan vision. Mandating changes to the Smithsonian’s exhibits and learning materials risks erasing vital truths and silencing the voices of those who fought for justice. This erasure or minimization of African American contributions distorts the nation’s collective memory and undermines efforts toward a more inclusive understanding of history. This kind of top-down interference sets a dangerous precedent for other cultural and educational institutions, signaling that facts can be reshaped to suit those in power. If left unchecked, it risks a future where public knowledge is curated to reinforce a narrow, politically convenient narrative rather than reflect reality. The lessons of the past, vital for guiding the present and future, are being repackaged to serve control rather than enlightenment.

📌Trump Advances His Makeover of the Kennedy Center, Giving Himself a Spotlight Role

What Happened: In February, Trump abruptly fired several Kennedy Center board members after denoting himself as the new chair of the board. This week Trump promised to end “woke political programming” at the Kennedy Center, namely drag shows, and illegally rename the institution after first lady Melania Trump. Most recently, Trump has announced this year’s list of Kennedy Center honorees which includes several long-time loyalists.

Why It Matters: Trump’s actions at the Kennedy Center are a deliberate attempt to dismantle one of America’s most respected cultural institutions. The awards, once a celebration of diverse artistry and independent vision, risk becoming a stage for loyalty tests and political theater. When leaders dictate who gets honored and what art is permissible, the boundaries of creative freedom shrink. Over time, this kind of control doesn’t just reshape the institution—it reshapes the national narrative about what art should be. This is how cultural spaces transform from platforms of free expression into showcases for state-approved narratives. What should be an open celebration of artistic excellence now teeters on becoming a megaphone for one man’s agenda.

🎭 Meme of the Week

See you next week—stay informed, stay engaged, and don’t let the BS fool you.

✨Your movement bestie – Shae

P.S. Know someone who needs a political reality check? Forward this email to them or tell them to subscribe!